Alan Jenkins
5c19ff79de
Booting with `systemd.log_level=debug` and looking in `dmesg -u` showed
messages like this:
systemd[433]: Failed to add rule for system call n/a() / 156, ignoring:
Numerical argument out of domain
This commit fixes it to:
systemd[449]: Failed to add rule for system call _sysctl() / 156,
ignoring: Numerical argument out of domain
Some of the messages could be even more misleading, e.g. we were reporting
that utimensat() / 320 was skipped as non-existent on x86, when actually
the syscall number 320 is kexec_file_load() on x86 .
The problem was that syscall NRs are looked up (and correctly passed to
libseccomp) as native syscall NRs. But we forgot that when we tried to
go back from the syscall NR to the name.
I think the natural way to write this would be
seccomp_syscall_resolve_num(nr), however there is no such function.
I couldn't work out a short comment that would make this clearer. FWIW
I wrote it up as a ticket for libseccomp instead.
https://github.com/seccomp/libseccomp/issues/104
systemd - System and Service Manager
Details
General information about systemd can be found in the systemd Wiki.
Information about build requirements are provided in the README file.
Consult our NEWS file for information about what's new in the most recent systemd versions.
Please see the HACKING file for information how to hack on systemd and test your modifications.
Please see our Contribution Guidelines for more information about filing GitHub Issues and posting GitHub Pull Requests.
When preparing patches for systemd, please follow our Coding Style Guidelines.
If you are looking for support, please contact our mailing list or join our IRC channel.