sd-netlink: make calc_elapse() return USEC_INFINITY when no timeout is requested

Then, timout_compare() becomes simplar, the timeout value becomes
consistent with what sd_netlink_get_timeout() provides.

This also drop unnecessary assignment of reply_callback.timeout after
the slot is dropped from the prioq.
This commit is contained in:
Yu Watanabe
2023-10-01 12:41:10 +09:00
parent cb88da8254
commit f5c615889a
2 changed files with 7 additions and 19 deletions
+1 -1
View File
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ void netlink_slot_disconnect(sd_netlink_slot *slot, bool unref) {
case NETLINK_REPLY_CALLBACK:
(void) hashmap_remove(nl->reply_callbacks, &slot->reply_callback.serial);
if (slot->reply_callback.timeout != 0)
if (slot->reply_callback.timeout != USEC_INFINITY)
prioq_remove(nl->reply_callbacks_prioq, &slot->reply_callback, &slot->reply_callback.prioq_idx);
break;
+6 -18
View File
@@ -215,7 +215,6 @@ static int process_timeout(sd_netlink *nl) {
return r;
assert_se(prioq_pop(nl->reply_callbacks_prioq) == c);
c->timeout = 0;
hashmap_remove(nl->reply_callbacks, UINT32_TO_PTR(c->serial));
slot = container_of(c, sd_netlink_slot, reply_callback);
@@ -248,10 +247,8 @@ static int process_reply(sd_netlink *nl, sd_netlink_message *m) {
if (!c)
return 0;
if (c->timeout != 0) {
if (c->timeout != USEC_INFINITY)
prioq_remove(nl->reply_callbacks_prioq, c, &c->prioq_idx);
c->timeout = 0;
}
r = sd_netlink_message_get_type(m, &type);
if (r < 0)
@@ -380,10 +377,7 @@ int sd_netlink_process(sd_netlink *nl, sd_netlink_message **ret) {
return r;
}
static usec_t calc_elapse(uint64_t usec) {
if (usec == UINT64_MAX)
return 0;
static usec_t timespan_to_timestamp(usec_t usec) {
if (usec == 0)
usec = NETLINK_DEFAULT_TIMEOUT_USEC;
@@ -442,12 +436,6 @@ int sd_netlink_wait(sd_netlink *nl, uint64_t timeout_usec) {
static int timeout_compare(const void *a, const void *b) {
const struct reply_callback *x = a, *y = b;
if (x->timeout != 0 && y->timeout == 0)
return -1;
if (x->timeout == 0 && y->timeout != 0)
return 1;
return CMP(x->timeout, y->timeout);
}
@@ -487,7 +475,7 @@ int sd_netlink_call_async(
return r;
slot->reply_callback.callback = callback;
slot->reply_callback.timeout = calc_elapse(usec);
slot->reply_callback.timeout = timespan_to_timestamp(usec);
k = sd_netlink_send(nl, m, &slot->reply_callback.serial);
if (k < 0)
@@ -497,7 +485,7 @@ int sd_netlink_call_async(
if (r < 0)
return r;
if (slot->reply_callback.timeout != 0) {
if (slot->reply_callback.timeout != USEC_INFINITY) {
r = prioq_put(nl->reply_callbacks_prioq, &slot->reply_callback, &slot->reply_callback.prioq_idx);
if (r < 0) {
(void) hashmap_remove(nl->reply_callbacks, UINT32_TO_PTR(slot->reply_callback.serial));
@@ -528,7 +516,7 @@ int sd_netlink_read(
assert_return(nl, -EINVAL);
assert_return(!netlink_pid_changed(nl), -ECHILD);
timeout = calc_elapse(usec);
timeout = timespan_to_timestamp(usec);
for (;;) {
_cleanup_(sd_netlink_message_unrefp) sd_netlink_message *m = NULL;
@@ -567,7 +555,7 @@ int sd_netlink_read(
/* received message, so try to process straight away */
continue;
if (timeout > 0) {
if (timeout != USEC_INFINITY) {
usec_t n;
n = now(CLOCK_MONOTONIC);