test-tpm2: add tests for tpm2_pcr_bank_from_efi_active()
Cover the full preference order (SHA256 > SHA384 > SHA512 > SHA1), the single-bank cases and the -EOPNOTSUPP path. Also test the _legacy() variant: a set with SHA384/SHA512 active but no SHA256 must resolve to SHA1, not SHA384, pinning down the backwards-compatibility behavior that keeps legacy sealed secrets unsealable. Co-developed-by: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -46,6 +46,70 @@ TEST(tpm2_pcr_index_from_string) {
|
||||
assert_se(tpm2_pcr_index_from_string("24") == -EINVAL);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
TEST(tpm2_pcr_bank_from_efi_active) {
|
||||
uint16_t bank;
|
||||
|
||||
/* SHA256 is the top preference whenever it is active. */
|
||||
ASSERT_OK(tpm2_pcr_bank_from_efi_active((1u << TPM2_ALG_SHA1) | (1u << TPM2_ALG_SHA256) | (1u << TPM2_ALG_SHA384) | (1u << TPM2_ALG_SHA512), &bank));
|
||||
ASSERT_EQ(bank, TPM2_ALG_SHA256);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Without SHA256, SHA384 is preferred over SHA512 (shorter digest, less TPM event log space), and
|
||||
* both win over SHA1. */
|
||||
ASSERT_OK(tpm2_pcr_bank_from_efi_active((1u << TPM2_ALG_SHA1) | (1u << TPM2_ALG_SHA384) | (1u << TPM2_ALG_SHA512), &bank));
|
||||
ASSERT_EQ(bank, TPM2_ALG_SHA384);
|
||||
ASSERT_OK(tpm2_pcr_bank_from_efi_active((1u << TPM2_ALG_SHA1) | (1u << TPM2_ALG_SHA512), &bank));
|
||||
ASSERT_EQ(bank, TPM2_ALG_SHA512);
|
||||
|
||||
/* SHA384-only firmware must resolve, not fail. */
|
||||
ASSERT_OK(tpm2_pcr_bank_from_efi_active(1u << TPM2_ALG_SHA384, &bank));
|
||||
ASSERT_EQ(bank, TPM2_ALG_SHA384);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Single-bank cases pick the obvious bank. */
|
||||
ASSERT_OK(tpm2_pcr_bank_from_efi_active(1u << TPM2_ALG_SHA256, &bank));
|
||||
ASSERT_EQ(bank, TPM2_ALG_SHA256);
|
||||
ASSERT_OK(tpm2_pcr_bank_from_efi_active(1u << TPM2_ALG_SHA512, &bank));
|
||||
ASSERT_EQ(bank, TPM2_ALG_SHA512);
|
||||
ASSERT_OK(tpm2_pcr_bank_from_efi_active(1u << TPM2_ALG_SHA1, &bank));
|
||||
ASSERT_EQ(bank, TPM2_ALG_SHA1);
|
||||
|
||||
/* No bank we are willing to use -> -EOPNOTSUPP. Empty mask, or only a bank we cannot hash in
|
||||
* software (SM3_256, TCG algorithm id 0x12). */
|
||||
ASSERT_ERROR(tpm2_pcr_bank_from_efi_active(0, &bank), EOPNOTSUPP);
|
||||
ASSERT_ERROR(tpm2_pcr_bank_from_efi_active(1u << 0x12, &bank), EOPNOTSUPP);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
TEST(tpm2_pcr_bank_from_efi_active_legacy) {
|
||||
uint16_t bank;
|
||||
|
||||
/* The legacy variant re-derives the bank for old enrollments that did not record one. Such secrets
|
||||
* could only ever have been sealed against SHA256 or SHA1, so the choice MUST stay restricted to
|
||||
* those two banks regardless of which stronger banks the firmware reports as active — otherwise we'd
|
||||
* re-derive a bank the secret was never bound to and silently fail to unseal. */
|
||||
|
||||
/* SHA256 stays the top preference. */
|
||||
ASSERT_OK(tpm2_pcr_bank_from_efi_active_legacy((1u << TPM2_ALG_SHA1) | (1u << TPM2_ALG_SHA256) | (1u << TPM2_ALG_SHA384) | (1u << TPM2_ALG_SHA512), &bank));
|
||||
ASSERT_EQ(bank, TPM2_ALG_SHA256);
|
||||
|
||||
/* The crucial backwards-compatibility case: with SHA384/SHA512 active but no SHA256, the legacy
|
||||
* variant must fall back to SHA1, NOT pick the stronger SHA384 the way the non-legacy variant does
|
||||
* (compare the SHA384 result in the test above). */
|
||||
ASSERT_OK(tpm2_pcr_bank_from_efi_active_legacy((1u << TPM2_ALG_SHA1) | (1u << TPM2_ALG_SHA384) | (1u << TPM2_ALG_SHA512), &bank));
|
||||
ASSERT_EQ(bank, TPM2_ALG_SHA1);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Single-bank cases for the two banks we accept. */
|
||||
ASSERT_OK(tpm2_pcr_bank_from_efi_active_legacy(1u << TPM2_ALG_SHA256, &bank));
|
||||
ASSERT_EQ(bank, TPM2_ALG_SHA256);
|
||||
ASSERT_OK(tpm2_pcr_bank_from_efi_active_legacy(1u << TPM2_ALG_SHA1, &bank));
|
||||
ASSERT_EQ(bank, TPM2_ALG_SHA1);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Banks the legacy variant never binds to -> -EOPNOTSUPP, even when active. A secret could not have
|
||||
* been sealed against these by the old code, so there is nothing to re-derive. */
|
||||
ASSERT_ERROR(tpm2_pcr_bank_from_efi_active_legacy(1u << TPM2_ALG_SHA384, &bank), EOPNOTSUPP);
|
||||
ASSERT_ERROR(tpm2_pcr_bank_from_efi_active_legacy(1u << TPM2_ALG_SHA512, &bank), EOPNOTSUPP);
|
||||
ASSERT_ERROR(tpm2_pcr_bank_from_efi_active_legacy((1u << TPM2_ALG_SHA384) | (1u << TPM2_ALG_SHA512), &bank), EOPNOTSUPP);
|
||||
ASSERT_ERROR(tpm2_pcr_bank_from_efi_active_legacy(0, &bank), EOPNOTSUPP);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
TEST(tpm2_util_pbkdf2_hmac_sha256) {
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user