Currently only a single job for a single unit can be enqueued
atomically,
so there is no guarantee that, e.g., starting a unit and its socket
at the same time will happen in the same transaction. That forces
callers to 'know' the right order in which to start new units being
installed, or failures will occur. It also means some ordering
constraints are ignored, in case the separate calls are done
in the wrong manual order.
Add a new EnqueueUnitJobMany() D-Bus method that takes a list of units
to start.
kexec-tools has a --reuse-cmdline option which is very convenient
when doing a lot of reboots, add the same to systemctl.
Dedup options, letting the last one wins in case of duplicates,
so that 'systemctl kexec --reuse-cmdline' can be chained many times
without continuosly expanding the cmdline with duplicates from
the boot entry.
So far we'd reject --state=, but it seems nicer to make it reset the
setting as we generally do. The output variable is modified in place…
Option parsing isn't atomic anyway, so I think it's fine to to that.
The fix for the corrupted state when units become aliased on reload
leaks the now-aliased unit's resources, which become untracked and
essentially lost.
While fixing the state corruption is of course necessary, leaking
processes/etc. is not ideal for a system and service manager, so
instead attempt to keep track of them by creating stub units
on-the-fly as replacements.
This way resources are not leaked, there are clear indications of
where they moved, and all state can be tracked as expected.
Ignore timers/sockets/paths as those are internal resources/triggers.
Follow-up for a77c7a8224
Allows appending kernel command line arguments, like
kexec-tool does. This is especially needed for the integration
tests, as mkosi adds a bunch of options that are needed for the
test suite to work, and it breaks without them.
During daemon-reload (or daemon-reexec), when a unit becomes an alias to
another unit, deserialising the alias's stale serialised state can
corrupt the canonical unit's live runtime state.
Consider this scenario:
1. Before reload:
- a.service is running
- b.service was stopped earlier and is dead
- Both exist as independent units
2. User creates an alias to migrate from b -> a:
- `ln -s /run/systemd/system/a.service /etc/systemd/system/b.service`
3. daemon-reload triggers serialisation. State file contains both units:
- a.service -> state=running, cgroup=/system.slice/a.service,
PID=1234, ...
- b.service -> state=dead, cgroup=(empty), no PIDs, ...
4. During deserialisation:
- Processes a.service: loads Unit A, deserialises -> state=RUNNING
- Processes b.service: manager_load_unit() detects symlink, returns
Unit A
- unit_deserialize_state(Unit A, ...) overwrites with b's dead state
5. The result is that:
- Unit A incorrectly shows state=dead despite PID 1234 still running
- If a.service has Upholds= dependents, catch-up logic sees
a.service should be running but is dead
- systemd starts a.service again -> PID 5678
- Two instances run: PID 1234 (left-over) and PID 5678 (new)
This bug is deterministic when serialisation orders a.service before
b.service.
The root cause is that manager_deserialize_one_unit() calls
manager_load_unit(name, &u) which resolves aliases via
unit_follow_merge(), returning the canonical Unit object. However, the
code doesn't distinguish between two cases when u->id differs from the
requested name from the state file. In the corruption case, we're
deserialising an alias entry and unit_deserialize_state() blindly
overwrites the canonical unit's fields with stale data from the old,
independent unit. The serialised b.service then overwrites Unit A's
correct live state.
This commit first scans the serialised unit names, then adds a check
after manager_load_unit():
if (!streq(u->id, name) && set_contains(serialized_units, u->id))
...
This detects when the loaded unit's canonical ID (u->id) differs from
the serialised name, indicating the name is now an alias for a different
unit and the canonical unit also has its own serialised state entry.
If the canonical unit does not have its own serialised state entry, we
keep the state entry. That handles cases where the old name is really
just a rename, and thus the old name is the only serialised state for
the unit. In that case there is no bug, because there is no separate
canonical state entry for the stale alias entry to overwrite.
Skipping is safe because:
1. The canonical unit's own state entry will be correctly deserialised
regardless of order. This fix only prevents other stale alias entries
from corrupting it.
2. unit_merge() has already transferred the necessary data. When
b.service became an alias during unit loading, unit_merge() already
migrated dependencies and references to the canonical unit.
3. After merging, the alias doesn't have its own runtime state. The
serialised data represents b.service when it was independent, which
is now obsolete once the canonical unit also has its own serialised
entry.
4. All fields are stale. unit_deserialize_state() would overwrite state,
timestamps, cgroup paths, pids, etc. There's no scenario where we
want this data applied on top of the canonical unit's own serialised
state.
This fix also correctly handles unit precedence. For example, imagine
this scenario:
1. `b.service` is a valid, running unit defined in `/run`.
2. The sysadmin creates `ln -s .../a.service /etc/.../b.service`.
3. On reload, the new symlink in `/etc` overrides the unit in `/run`.
The new perspective from the manager side is that `b.service` is now an
alias for `a.service`.
In this case, systemd correctly abandons the old b.service unit, because
that's the intended general semantics of unit file precedence. We also
do that in other cases, like when a unit file in /etc/systemd/system/
masks a vendor-supplied unit file in /lib/systemd/system/, or when an
admin uses systemctl mask to explicitly disable a unit.
In all these scenarios, the configuration with the highest precedence
(in /etc/) is treated as the new source of truth. The old unit's
definition is discarded, and its running processes are (correctly)
abandoned. In that respect we are not doing anything new here.
Some may ask why we shouldn't just ignore the symlink if we think this
case will come up. I think there are multiple very strong reasons not to
do so:
1. It violates unit precedence. The unit design is built on a strict
precedence list. When an admin puts any file in /etc, they are
intentionally overriding everything else. If manager_load_unit were
to "ignore" this file based on runtime state, it would break this
fundamental precedent.
2. It makes daemon-reload stateful. daemon-reload is supposed to be a
simple, stateless operation, basically to read the files on disk and
apply the new configuration. But doing this would make daemon-reload
stateful, because we'd have to read the files on disk, but
cross-reference the current runtime state, and... maybe ignore some
files. This is complex and unpredictable.
3. It also completely ignores the user intent. The admin clearly has
tried to replace the old service with an alias. Ignoring their
instruction is the opposite of what they want.
Fixes: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/38817
Fixes: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/37482
Closes#40883. As described in the issue, it's not "jobs" that are
marked, and also the name is unnecessarilly long.
I think we don't need any compatibility measures here. At least in the
rpm world, package upgrade scripts go through the helper which is part
of the package so the new systemctl and the new helper are upgraded
together.
This reverts commit 351b4dd123.
I'm pretty sure we should not create more of these multiplexer
interfaces, which in this specific also leads to a fair bit of
confusion: start/stop/reload-or-restart --marked all enqueue
all job types.
Instead, a dedicated verb will be introduced in later commits.
Closes#3829
Alternative to #35417
I don't think the individual "WasOnDependencyCycle" attrs on units
are particularly helpful and comprehensible, as it's really about
the dep relationship between them. And as discussed, the dependency
cycle is not something persistent, rather local to the currently
loaded set of units and shall be reset with daemon-reload (see also
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/35642#issuecomment-2591296586).
Hence, let's report system state as degraded and point users to
the involved transactions when ordering cycles are encountered instead.
Combined with log messages added in 6912eb315f
it should achieve the goal of making ordering cycles more observable,
while avoiding all sorts of subtle bookkeeping in the service manager.
The degraded state can be reset via the existing ResetFailed() manager-wide
method.
We had a downstream discussion on what `systemctl reload-or-restart
--marked` does, until upstream chimed in and pointed on very special
behavior for that combination. 😜
The second references the first, but not vice versa. Let's fix this.
In the troff output, this doesn't seem to make any difference. But in the
html output, the whitespace is sometimes preserved, creating an additional
gap before the following content. Drop it everywhere to avoid this.
These operations might require slow I/O, and thus might block PID1's main
loop for an undeterminated amount of time. Instead of performing them
inline, fork a worker process and stash away the D-Bus message, and reply
once we get a SIGCHILD indicating they have completed. That way we don't
break compatibility and callers can continue to rely on the fact that when
they get the method reply the operation either succeeded or failed.
To keep backward compatibility, unlike reload control processes, these
are ran inside init.scope and not the target cgroup. Unlike ExecReload,
this is under our control and is not defined by the unit. This is necessary
because previously the operation also wasn't ran from the target cgroup,
so suddenly forking a copy-on-write copy of pid1 into the target cgroup
will make memory usage spike, and if there is a MemoryMax= or MemoryHigh=
set and the cgroup is already close to the limit, it will cause an OOM
kill, where previously it would have worked fine.
Currently inhibitors are bypassed unless an explicit request is made to
check for them, or even in that case when the requestor is root or the
same uid as the holder of the lock.
But in many cases this makes it impractical to rely on inhibitor locks.
For example, in Debian there are several convoluted and archaic
workarounds that divert systemctl/reboot to some hacky custom scripts
to try and enforce blocking accidental reboots, when it's not expected
that the requestor will remember to specify the command line option
to enable checking for active inhibitor locks.
Also in many cases one wants to ensure that locks taken by a user are
respected by actions initiated by that same user.
Change logind so that inhibitors checks are not skipped in these
cases, and systemctl so that locks are checked in order to show a
friendly error message rather than "permission denied".
Add new block-weak and delay-weak modes that keep the previous
behaviour unchanged.
Update frameworks that work automatically in the background
occasionally need to schedule reboots. Systemd-logind already
provides a nice mechanism to schedule shutdowns, send notfications
and block logins short before the time. Systemd has a framework for
calendar events, so we may conveniently use logind to define a
maintenance time for reboots.
The existing ScheduleShutdown DBus method in logind expects a usec_t
with an absolute time. Passing USEC_INFINITY as magic value now tells
logind to take the time from the configured maintenance time if set.
"shutdown -r" leverages that and uses the maintenance time
automatically if configured. The one minute default is still used if
nothing was specified.
Similarly the new 'auto' setting for the --when parameter of systemctl
uses the maintenance time if configured or a one minute timer like the
shutdown command.
Like much English text, the systemd documentation uses "may not" in the
sense of both "will possibly not" and "is forbidden to". In many cases
this is OK because the context makes it clear, but in others I felt it
was possible to read the "is forbidden to" sense by mistake: in
particular, I tripped over "the target file may not exist" in
systemd.unit(5) before realizing the correct interpretation.
Use "might not" or "may choose not to" in these cases to make it clear
which sense we mean.
In the majority of cases, this is caused by
sleep_supported() returning error. Hence it's
very likely that it would fail again, so
the fallback is not really useful. Instead,
honor the --force option for these verbs.
TEST-26-SYSTEMCTL is racy as we call systemctl is-active immediately
after systemctl kill. Let's implement --wait for systemctl kill and
use it in TEST-26-SYSTEMCTL to avoid the race.