When I see "test", I have to think three times what the return value
means. With "below" this is immediately clear. ratelimit_below(&limit)
sounds almost like English and is imho immediately obvious.
(I also considered ratelimit_ok, but this strongly implies that being under the
limit is somehow better. Most of the times this is true, but then we use the
ratelimit to detect triple-c-a-d, and "ok" doesn't fit so well there.)
C.f. a1bcaa07.
We can jump to chase_one from two places. In the first 'todo' is set to
'buffer', which comes from path_make_absolute_cwd() and is nonnull In the
second 'todo' is set to 'joined' which is checked to be nonull a few lines
above the jump. So let's kill the code that deals with null todo there.
CID #1390941.
This means that when those targets are built, all the sources are built again,
instead of reusing the work done to create libbasic.a and other convenience static
libraries. It would be nice to not do this, but there seems to be no support in
our toolchain for joining multiple static libraries into one. When linking
a static library, any -l arguments are simply ignored by ar/gcc-ar, and .a
libraries given as positional arguments are copied verbatim into the archive
so they objects in them cannot be accessed.
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/2157629/linking-static-libraries-to-other-static-libraries
suggests either unzipping all the archives and putting them back togather,
or using a linker script. Unzipping and zipping back together seems ugly.
The other option is not very nice. The linker script language does not
allow "+" to appear in the filenames, and filenames that meson generates
use that, so files would have to be renamed before a linker script was used.
And we would have to generate the linker script on the fly. Either way, this
doesn't seem attractive. Since those static libraries are a niche use case,
it seems reasonable to just go with the easiest and safest solution and
recompile all the source files. Thanks to ccache, this is probably almost as
cheap as actually reusing the convenience .a libraries.
test-libsystemd-sym.c and test-libudev-sym.c compile fine with the generated
static libs, so it seems that they indeed provide all the symbols they should.
if we lack privs to create device nodes that's fine, and creating
/run/systemd/inaccessible/chr or /run/systemd/inaccessible/blk won't
work then. Document this in longer comments.
Fixes: #4484
Before this, `signal_from_string()` accepts simple signal name
or RTMIN+n. This makes the function also accept RTMIN, RTMAX,
and RTMAX-n.
Note that RTMIN+0 is equivalent to RTMIN, and RTMAX-0 is to RTMAX.
This also fixes the integer overflow reported by oss-fuzz #8064.
https://oss-fuzz.com/v2/testcase-detail/5648573352902656
Let's simplify the code a bit. Let's reduce the number of redundant if
checks a bit, (i.e. if we want to check for equality with
VIRTUALIZATION_VM_OTHER there's no need to check for non-equality with
VIRTUALIZATION_NONE first). As a very welcome side-effect this means we
lose some lines of code and our level of indentation is reduced.
No changes in behaviour.
This extends the change done in b29f6480ec to other logging functions.
This actually fixes some bugs in callers of log_struct(), for example
config_parse_alias() called 'return log_syntax(..., 0, ...)' which could result
in a bogus non-zero return value.
Calls to log_object() and log_format_iovec() — which is only used by
server_driver_message() — appear correct.
Let's optionally translate BSD exit codes to error strings too.
My first approach on adding this was to turn ExitStatusLevel into a
bitmask rather than a linear level, with one bit for the various feature
bits. However, the exit code ranges are generally not defined
independently from each other, i.e. our own ones are defined with the
LSB ones in mind, and most sets are defined with the ISO C ones.
Hence, instead I changed the existing hierarchy of MINIMAL, SYSTEMD, LSB
with an alias of FULL == LSB, only slightly by seperating FULL and LSB
into two separate levels, so that there's now:
1. MINIMAL (only EXIT_SUCCESS/EXIT_FAILURE)
2. SYSTEMD (incorporating our own exit codes)
3. LSB (like SYSTEMD but adding in LSB service exit codes)
4. FULL (like FULL but adding BSD exit codes)
Note that across the codebase only FULL, SYSTEMD, and MINIMAL are used,
depending on context, how much we know about the process and whether we
are logging for debugging purposes or not. This means the LSB level
wouldn't really have to be separate, but it appeared careless to me to
fold it into FULL along with the BSD exit codes.
Note that this commit doesn't change much for regular codepaths: the
FULL exit status level is only used during debug logging, as a helper to
the user reading the debug logs.
Of course, alloca() shouldn't be used with anything that can grow
without bounds anyway, but let's better safe than sorry, and catch this
early.
Since alloca() is not supposed to return an error we trigger an
assert() instead, which is still better than heap trickery.
Previously we were a bit sloppy with the index and size types of arrays,
we'd regularly use unsigned. While I don't think this ever resulted in
real issues I think we should be more careful there and follow a
stricter regime: unless there's a strong reason not to use size_t for
array sizes and indexes, size_t it should be. Any allocations we do
ultimately will use size_t anyway, and converting forth and back between
unsigned and size_t will always be a source of problems.
Note that on 32bit machines "unsigned" and "size_t" are equivalent, and
on 64bit machines our arrays shouldn't grow that large anyway, and if
they do we have a problem, however that kind of overly large allocation
we have protections for usually, but for overflows we do not have that
so much, hence let's add it.
So yeah, it's a story of the current code being already "good enough",
but I think some extra type hygiene is better.
This patch tries to be comprehensive, but it probably isn't and I missed
a few cases. But I guess we can cover that later as we notice it. Among
smaller fixes, this changes:
1. strv_length()' return type becomes size_t
2. the unit file changes array size becomes size_t
3. DNS answer and query array sizes become size_t
Fixes: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76745
If the main config file or one of the drop-ins did not have the final newline,
there would be no seperating empty line (or if this was the last file
displayed, our own output would end without the final newline, possibly running
into the subsequent prompt or such). copy_bytes() does not know anything about
lines, so let's just use a normal loop with read_line() and puts().
This implements similar logic as conf_files_cat(), but with slightly different
file gathering logic. I also want to add support for replacement files later on,
so it seems better to keep those two file-gathering functions separate.
This is used as 'systemd-analyze show-config systemd/logind.conf', which
will dump
/etc/systemd/system/user@.service
/etc/systemd/system/user@.service.d/*.conf
/run/systemd/system/user@.service.d/*.conf
/usr/local/lib/systemd/system/user@.service.d/*.conf
/usr/lib/systemd/system/user@.service.d/*.conf
The idea is to make it easy to dump the configuration using the same locations
and order that systemd programs use themselves (including masking, in the right
order, etc.). This is the generic variant that works with any configuration
scheme that follows the same general rules:
$ systemd-analyze cat-config systemd/system.conf
$ systemd-analyze cat-config systemd/user.conf
$ systemd-analyze cat-config systemd/logind.conf
$ systemd-analyze cat-config systemd/sleep.conf
$ systemd-analyze cat-config systemd/journald.conf
$ systemd-analyze cat-config systemd/journal-remote.conf
$ systemd-analyze cat-config systemd/journal-upload.conf
$ systemd-analyze cat-config systemd/coredump.conf
$ systemd-analyze cat-config systemd/resolved.conf
$ systemd-analyze cat-config systemd/timesyncd.conf
$ systemd-analyze cat-config udev/udev.conf
We use MTUs all over the place, let's add a unified, strict parser for
it, that takes MTU ranges into account.
We already have parse_ifindex() close-by, hence this appears to be a
natural addition, in particular as the range checking is not entirely
trivial to do, as it depends on the protocol used.
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
Mike Gilbert
Lennart Poettering
Yu Watanabe
David Tardon
Adam Duskett