lstat() returns the error in errno, not as return value. Let's propagate
this correctly.
This broke the bolt test suite, as @gicmo discovered.
Follow-up for acfc2a1d15.
Let's define both an enum and a typedef named SpecialGlyph, the way we
usually do it.
Also, introduce an "invalid" special glyph, assigned to -EINVAL, also
like we always do it. (And handle it somewhat sanely in special_glyph()
create_fifo() was added in a2fc2f8dd3, and
would always ignore failure. The test was trying to fail in this case, but
we actually don't fail, which seems to be correct. We didn't notice before
because the test was ineffective.
To make things consistent, generally log at warning level, but don't propagate
the error. For symlinks, log at debug level, as before.
For 'e', failure is not propagated now. The test is adjusted to match.
I think warning is appropriate in most cases: we do not expect a device node to
be replaced by a different device node or even a non-device file. This would
most likely be an error somewhere. An exception is made for symlinks, which are
mismatched on purpose, for example /etc/resolv.conf. With this patch, we don't
get any warnings with the any of the 74 tmpfiles.d files, which suggests that
increasing the warning levels will not cause too many unexpected warnings. If
it turns out that there are valid cases where people have expected mismatches
for non-symlink types, we can always decrease the log levels again.
Also add "system" in the messages, because we set the internal value,
and are just skipping the setting of the external value, so the message
could be confusing without that clarification.
We didn't document this behaviour one way or another, so I think it's
OK to change. All callers do the NULL check before callling this to avoid
the assert warning, so it seems reasonable to do it internally.
sd_bus_can_send() is similar, but there we expressly say that an
error is returned on NULL, so I didn't change it.
Also use standard error loggin/return pattern.
Only cursory tested, by checking that with a simple config file
the array is the same before/after. Not tested with actual scsi
rules and devices, due to missing hardware.
Some static analyzers (lgtm) warn against using non-re-entrant functions,
even though at the moment this code is not multi-threaded, just switch to
format_timestamp.
gcc-11.0.1-0.3.fc34.x86_64 with -Og was complaining that 'r' might be
unitialized. It cannot, but let's rework the code to use a goto instead of
conditionalizing on 'call' being unset, which I think is clearer and less error
prone. This silences the warning.
gcc-11.0.1-0.3.fc34.x86_64 was complaining that n might be unset with
--optimization=1. It was wrong, but let's rework the code to make it
obvious that it is always set.
This also makes function id is parsed as uint64_t. Kernel internally
uses uint32_t for function id (see the definition of 'struct zpci_dev),
but it maybe extended in the future.
gcc 9.3.0 "cc (Ubuntu 9.3.0-17ubuntu1~20.04) 9.3.0" with --optimization=1 was
not able to figure out that all cases are covered because r is either set in
the switch or type < _TABLE_DATA_TYPE_MAX.
But for a human reader this might also not be obvious: the cases are not in
exactly the same order as enum definitions, and it's a long list. By using the
goto, there should be no doubt, and we avoid checking the condition a second
time.
So far when parsing /proc/cmdline we'd consider backslashes as
mechanisms for escaping whitepace or quotes. This changes things so that
they are retained as they are instead. The kernel itself doesn't allow such
escaping, and hence we shouldn't do so either (see lib/cmdline.c in the
kernel sources; it does support "" quotes btw).
This fix is useful to allow specifying backslash escapes in the "root="
cmdline option to be passed through to systemd-fstab-generator. Example:
root=/dev/disk/by-partlabel/Root\x20Partition
Previously we'd eat up the "\" so that we'd then look for a device
/dev/disk/by-partlabel/Rootx20Partition which never shows up.
In b9c19bc384, I added an assert to _setfv() and
_setf(), but I forgot to do the same in _set(). Let's do this for completeness.
While at it, restructure _set() to use the same style as _setfv().
This should make it easier to remove those warnings when the compiler
gets smarter. Not sure if I got them all...
Double space before the comment start to make it easier to separate from the
preceding line.