If we want to allow method replies to be extended without this breaking
compat, then we should set this flag. Do so at various method call
replies hence.
Also do it when parsing user/group records, which are expressly
documented to be extensible, as well as the hibernate JSON record.
varlink_dispatch() is a simple wrapper around json_dispatch() that
returns clean, standards-compliant InvalidParameter error back to
clients, if the specified JSON cannot be parsed properly.
For this json_dispatch() is extended to return the offending field's
name. Because it already has quite a few parameters, I then renamed
json_dispatch() to json_dispatch_full() and made json_dispatch() a
wrapper around it that passes the new argument as NULL. While doing so I
figured we should also get rid of the bad= argument in the short
wrapper, since it's only used in the OCI code.
To simplify the OCI code this adds a second wrapper oci_dispatch()
around json_dispatch_full(), that fills in bad= the way we want.
Net result: instead of one json_dispatch() call there are now:
1. json_dispatch_full() for the fully feature mother of all dispathers.
2. json_dispatch() for the simpler version that you want to use most of
the time.
3. varlink_dispatch() that generates nice Varlink errors
4. oci_dispatch() that does the OCI specific error handling
And that's all there is.
This macro is like JSON_BUILD_STRING() but uses our json library's
ability to use literal strings directly as JsonVariant objects.
The changes all our codebase to use this new macro whenever we build
JSON objects from literal strings.
(I tried to make this automatic, i.e. to detect in JSON_BUILD_STRING()
whether something is a literal string nicely and thus do this stuff
automatically, but I couldn't find a way.)
This should reduce memory usage of our JSON code a bit. Constant strings
we use very often will now be shared and mapped directly from the ELF
image.
In general we almost never hit those asserts in production code, so users see
them very rarely, if ever. But either way, we just need something that users
can pass to the developers.
We have quite a few of those asserts, and some have fairly nice messages, but
many are like "WTF?" or "???" or "unexpected something". The error that is
printed includes the file location, and function name. In almost all functions
there's at most one assert, so the function name alone is enough to identify
the failure for a developer. So we don't get much extra from the message, and
we might just as well drop them.
Dropping them makes our code a tiny bit smaller, and most importantly, improves
development experience by making it easy to insert such an assert in the code
without thinking how to phrase the argument.
Let's initialize this at the same place for any iterator allocated. (Yes
not all types of iterator objects need this, but it's still nice to
share this trivial code at one place).
Clearly communicate to callers that we didn't find a single varlink
service, when a lookup is attempted. Note that the fallback's to NSS,
drop-ins and synthesis might eat up this error again, but we should
really make this case reasonably recognizable, in particular as our
various tools already handle this condition correctly and print a nice
message then.
Let's use "exclude" for flags that really exclude records from our
lookup. Let's use "avoid" referring to concepts that when flag is set
we'll not use but we have a fallback path for that should yield the same
result. Let' use "suppress" for suppressing partial info, even if we
return the record otherwise.
So far we used "avoid" for all these cases, which was confusing.
Whiel we are at it, let's reassign the bits a bit, leaving some space
for bits follow-up commits are going to add.
They both are both short and contain similar parts and various helper will be
shared between both parts of the code so it's easier to use a single file.
sssd people don't like enumeration and for some other cases it's not
nice to support either, in particular when synthesizing records for
container/userns UID/GID ranges.
Hence, let's make enumeration optional.
The call would always fail with:
systemd-userwork[780]: Failed to dlopen(libnss_systemd.so.2), ignoring: /usr/lib64libnss_systemd.so.2: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
Previously we'd used the existance of a specific AF_UNIX socket in the
abstract namespace as lock for disabling lookup recursions. (for
breaking out of the loop: userdb synthesized from nss → nss synthesized
from userdb → userdb synthesized from nss → …)
I did it like that because it promised to work the same both in static
and in dynmically linked environments and is accessible easily from any
programming language.
However, it has a weakness regarding reuse attacks: the socket is
securely hashed (siphash) from the thread ID in combination with the
AT_RANDOM secret. Thus it should not be guessable from an attacker in
advance. That's only true if a thread takes the lock only once and
keeps it forever. However, if a thread takes and releases it multiple
times an attacker might monitor that and quickly take the lock
after the first iteration for follow-up iterations.
It's not a big issue given that userdb (as the primary user for this)
never released the lock and we never made the concept a public
interface, and it was only included in one release so far, but it's
something that deserves fixing. (moreover it's a local DoS only, only
permitting to disable native userdb lookups)
With this rework the libnss_systemd.so.2 module will now export two
additional symbols. These symbols are not used by glibc, but can be used
by arbitrary programs: one can be used to disable nss-systemd, the other
to check if it is currently disabled.
The lock is per-thread. It's slightly less pretty, since it requires
people to manually link against C code via dlopen()/dlsym(), but it
should work safely without the aforementioned weakness.
Patch contains a coccinelle script, but it only works in some cases. Many
parts were converted by hand.
Note: I did not fix errors in return value handing. This will be done separate
to keep the patch comprehensible. No functional change is intended in this
patch.
This reworks the user validation infrastructure. There are now two
modes. In regular mode we are strict and test against a strict set of
valid chars. And in "relaxed" mode we just filter out some really
obvious, dangerous stuff. i.e. strict is whitelisting what is OK, but
"relaxed" is blacklisting what is really not OK.
The idea is that we use strict mode whenver we allocate a new user
(i.e. in sysusers.d or homed), while "relaxed" mode is when we process
users registered elsewhere, (i.e. userdb, logind, …)
The requirements on user name validity vary wildly. SSSD thinks its fine
to embedd "@" for example, while the suggested NAME_REGEX field on
Debian does not even allow uppercase chars…
This effectively liberaralizes a lot what we expect from usernames.
The code that warns about questionnable user names is now optional and
only used at places such as unit file parsing, so that it doesn't show
up on every userdb query, but only when processing configuration files
that know better.
Fixes: #15149#15090
This prevents an error in pam_systemd when logging in.
sshd[2623165]: pam_unix(sshd:session): session opened for user tony.stark(uid=10001) by (uid=0)
sshd[2623165]: pam_systemd(sshd:session): Failed to get user record: Invalid argument
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/708824
Lennart Poettering
Luca Boccassi
Yu Watanabe
Frantisek Sumsal
Samuel Cabrero
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
David Tardon
Joerg Behrmann
Mike Gilbert