This is the only place where xdg_user_dir() is needed and
makes sense. All other invocations have been replaced with
user_search_dirs() - see previous commits for details.
* Rename user_dirs() -> user_unit_search_dirs() and port to
user_search_dirs()
* Use STRV_IFNOTNULL to guard paths that could be NULL,
assert otherwise
xdg_user_dirs() doesn't seem well-organized currently.
In all other xdg_user_*() funcs we assume /etc/xdg/systemd
to be a symlink to /etc/systemd/, hence it is the odd one out.
Also, when the relevant envvar is unset, it only returns
the global search dirs.
sd_path_lookup() actually covers this nicely with SD_PATH_SEARCH_*,
where the combined search paths (from user home and system) are used.
Therefore, let's introduce a wrapper for that, and deprecate xdg_user_dirs()
(would be removed in later commits).
Note that -ENXIO reported by xdg_user_config_dir() is now properly
propagated rather than ignored, as unlike XDG_RUNTIME_DIR, XDG_CONFIG_HOME
has a default value hence ENXIO is not really expected.
Preparation for later commits, where path-lookup would be
moved into libsystemd.
Note that it currently includes sd-id128.h, hence shared/
seems more appropriate anyway.
boot loader specification states:
architecture: refers to the architecture this entry is for. The argument
should be an architecture identifier, using the architecture vocabulary
defined by the EFI specification (i.e. IA32, x64, IA64, ARM, AA64, …).
If specified and it does not match the local system architecture this
entry should be hidden. The comparison should be done case-insensitively.
Example: architecture aa64
https://uapi-group.org/specifications/specs/boot_loader_specification/#type-1-boot-loader-entry-keys
The API introduced in https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/34295
is less than ideal:
- It doesn't consider signing at all (ukify can't sign separately yet)
- Measurement is completely broken (all profile sections are marked to
not be measured)
- It focuses on a very niche use case of extending existing UKIs and makes
the more common use case of building a UKI with several profiles included
much harder than needed.
Let's instead rework the API to focus on the primary use case of building
a UKI with multiple profiles added to it immediately. We require the profiles
to be built upfront as separate PE binaries with UKI. There's no need to sign
or measure these, they're solely vehicles for profile sections. This saves us
from having to complicate the command line and config parsing to support defining
multiple profiles.
To add the profiles when building a UKI, we introduce the new --add-profile
switch which takes a path to a PE binary describing a profile. The required
sections are read from each PE binary, measured and added as a profile.
The integration test is disabled until the new API is merged and exposed in
mkosi so that building a UKI with profiles can be left to mkosi and the integration
test will only test the switching between profiles and not the building of UKIs
with profiles.
Ivan Kruglov
Yu Watanabe
Lukas Nykryn
Benjamin ROBIN
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
Mike Yuan
Daniel Martinez
Daan De Meyer
Luca Boccassi